Pitch Deck Analyzer

The free PitchScan pitch deck analyzer runs those three condensed partner archetypes over your deck in a single pass, covering 14 named checks in total. Each archetype scores the deck from 0 to 100 silently, then the committee agrees on one consensus score. You get that score out of 100, a letter grade, a one-line verdict written to you, and the top 3 findings ranked by severity. It takes under 2 minutes, with no signup and no credit card.

Nothing above is a marketing rounding. Those are the checks the model is instructed to run, in that order, which is why they are printed here instead of summarized into a promise about artificial intelligence.

Missing points lose slower than half-covered ones. A missing slide is at least honest: the investor asks about it, you answer. A slide that exists without closing its argument is worse, because the question never gets asked and the doubt quietly joins the vote against you. Most rejections founders read as bad luck are half-covered points nobody named out loud.

A checklist is only half the job. The other half is deciding whose opinion to act on once the notes start arriving, which is covered in our guide to pitch deck feedback: where to get it, and how to tell signal from taste.

The free analysis is one pass by one committee. The paid report is not a longer version of it, it is a different mechanism. Between 7 and 10 personas are selected for your deck out of a bank of 11, picked for what your company actually is rather than dealt out at random. Each one reads the deck independently, in its own model call, with no idea what the others concluded. A meta-analysis pass then reconciles them.

The disagreement is the product. A single reviewer, human or model, averages your deck into a polite 7 out of 10. Seven to ten readers who never spoke to each other do not converge, and the seams where they split are the seams your real investment committee will split on. Five dollars, once, no subscription. You can also just take the free score, fix the top finding and check whether the deck is ready to send.

Founders look for this tool under three words and mean slightly different things by each. A pitch deck checker suggests a checklist: is there a market slide, a traction slide, an ask. That half is cheap and mostly reassuring, because almost every deck that gets passed on contained all the expected slides. A pitch deck evaluator suggests judgment: is what is written on those slides any good, and does it hold when someone pushes back.

An analyzer has to do both, in that order. Coverage first, because a missing unit economics slide is a finding on its own. Then the harder pass: the market number rebuilt from the bottom up, the traction chart read for what its axis is hiding, the moat claim tested against an incumbent shipping your roadmap next quarter. That second pass is where the score moves, and it is the reason a deck can tick all 12 conventional boxes and still come back in the sixties. Both words now land here, because a page that only checked coverage was a page that stopped at the easy half; the scoring page shows how points come off.